<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Git for Document/Software Version Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zzapper.co.uk/using-git-for-documentsoftware-version-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zzapper.co.uk/using-git-for-documentsoftware-version-control/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:48:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josef Betancourt&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://zzapper.co.uk/using-git-for-documentsoftware-version-control/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>Josef Betancourt&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zzapper.co.uk/?p=77#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ad Hoc Version Control With&#160;Git...&lt;/strong&gt;

In my blog post &#8220;How to do Ad Hoc Version Control&#8221; I suggested Mercurial as very good DVCS to use. However, Git is good enough I suppose, having not used it yet.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ad Hoc Version Control With&nbsp;Git&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In my blog post &#8220;How to do Ad Hoc Version Control&#8221; I suggested Mercurial as very good DVCS to use. However, Git is good enough I suppose, having not used it yet&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

